Advance Blog

August 31, 2020
baker MC

Doing Business While Social Distancing: Things to consider when using e-signatures

It is undeniable that the use of e-signatures has dramatically increased and become a preferable method for signing a document during this unprecedented period of social distancing and working from home. The following three issues, i.e. virtual signature; presence of witness; and e-signature for company meetings, are explored in this alert.

Is a virtual signature equal to an e-signature?

While the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) Recommendation on the ICT Standard for Electronic Transactions: Electronic Signature Guideline already provides some examples of formats of e-signatures (i.e. the typing of the name at the end of an email, the scanning of a picture of a wet-ink signature and attaching it to an e-document, the use of a stylus, the clicking of an acceptance button, the ticking in an acceptance box, and the use of digital signature), a question still arises regarding “virtual signature” (i.e. a signature physically signed on a printed document in wet ink and scanned back into the computer). The question is whether a virtual signature is considered an e-signature or not.

The Electronic Transaction Act B.E. 2544 (2001) prescribes that an electronic signature means any symbol created in electronic form and affixed to an electronic message in order to establish the association between a person and an electronic message. Therefore, once the document is printed out, it is no longer a data message in an electronic format but rather a physical one. When such physical copy is signed physically using wet ink, such wet ink is not considered to be created in an electronic format. If one wishes to ensure that a non-electronic formatted document signed by wet ink could convert back to an electronic format and be legally valid, relevant laws and regulations on converting physical documents into e-documents must also be observed and complied with.

Presence of a witness in an e-signature case

Some forms of legal agreements (e.g. deeds) require witnesses to confirm that the signature in question is genuine. This could become problematic during the social distancing period as it would not be convenient for a witness to be present at the same place as the signatory who wishes to execute a contract using an e-signature.

In a case where the law requires the signature of a witness (e.g. transferring shares entered in a name certificate), it is arguable whether the witness has to be “present physically” at the same place as the parties who are signing the agreement or whether electronically witnessing from a distance via live video call would suffice. We view that not only e-transaction/e-meeting related laws must be met, but also general legal formalities for each document/transaction must also be followed to ensure legal validity of such document/transaction.

E-signature for company meetings

Recently, the Emergency Decree re: Electronic Meetings B.E. 2563 (2020) was published which allows electronic meetings to form a quorum without imposing the requirement of a minimum number of participants being physically at the same place. Leading from this, as shareholders’/directors’ meetings can take place electronically, minutes of meetings that require the signature of the meeting’s chairman or the appointment of shareholder proxies could also be done electronically during this period of social distancing. The chairman of the meeting could e-sign the minutes of the meeting and the shareholders could appoint their proxies using their e-signatures, which would have the same legal effect, provided that the legal criteria under e-signature laws and regulations are met. However, it also needs to be taken into account whether the internal regulations of the company allow for e-signatures.

Dhiraphol Suwanprateep, Partner, Baker McKenzie
Dhiraphol Suwanprateep is Head of the Technology, Media and Telecoms Practice Group and Co-Head of the Intellectual Property and Technology Practice Group at Baker McKenzie in Bangkok. Dhiraphol has a vast amount of experience in advising clients on government initiatives, particularly Thailand’s Digital Economy Plan. Dhiraphol’s expertise in areas such as telecommunications law, computer crime and data privacy, online business operations and cybersecurity has made him a highly coveted contributor for a variety of leading publications.
Nont Horayangura, Partner, Baker McKenzie
Nont Horayangura is a Partner in the Intellectual Property and Technology Practice Group at Baker McKenzie in Bangkok. Nont has a great deal of experience representing a wide range of business and institutional clients in various data protection, technology, and IP matters. Nont is one of Thailand’s leading lawyers on PDPA related matters and his work also includes oversight of the implementation of corporate privacy structures and creation of data related policies, forms and agreements.
Kritiyanee Buranatrevedhya, Lawyer, Baker McKenzie
Kritiyanee Buranatrevedhya is a Senior Associate in the Intellectual Property and Technology Practice Group at Baker McKenzie in Bangkok. Kritiyanee focuses on data privacy and protection, data analytics, electronic transactions, cloud computing, computer crime, and cybersecurity. Kritiyanee advises clients in issues pertaining to data protection, e-commerce and technology, digital content/platform, and intellectual property.
Kankanit Tantitham, Lawyer, Baker McKenzie
Kankanit Tantitham is an Associate in the Intellectual Property and Technology Practice Group at Baker McKenzie in Bangkok. Kankanit’s main areas of focus are data privacy and protection, electronic transactions and cloud computing. Kankanit counsels clients in data protection, e-commerce & technology, and digital content/platform.

Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (“PDPA”)

As the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) also applies to personal data collected prior to the PDPA’s entry into force, please be informed that AustCham Thailand will automatically keep your contact details including email address, name and last name, and company details, on our mailing list.

Your data was received by AustCham Thailand as a result from you either registering or attending an event, contacting our office or subscribing to regular updates via the website. However, if you would like to stop receiving emails AustCham Thailand and revoke your consent for AustCham to keep and use your data to contact you for chamber events and updates, please scroll down to the end of this email and click “Unsubscribe from this list”. Your personal data will be shortly deleted once the opt-out notice request is received.

Please note that your data is kept in AustCham’s CRM system, please see here for AustCham’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. AustCham uses a management software system from Wild Apricot, and emails are distributed through MailChimp.